Cladoceran- and copepod-dominated zooplankton communities graze at similar rates in low-productivity lakes

Publication Type  Journal Article
Year of Publication  1998
Authors  Cyr, H.
Journal Title  CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES
Journal Date  FEB
Volume  55
Issue  2
Pagination  414-422
ISBN Number  0706-652X
Key Words  FRESH-WATER ZOOPLANKTON; EUDIAPTOMUS-GRACILIS; HOLOPEDIUM-GIBBERUM; NITROGEN-EXCRETION; FILTERING RATES; EUTROPHIC LAKE; CASTLE LAKE; ALGAL SIZE; FOOD SIZE; PHYTOPLANKTON
Abstract  

Many studies suggest that the taxonomic composition of a zooplankton community should determine its grazing rate and selectivity for different types of particles. It is generally believed that copepod-dominated communities should (i) have lower grazing rates and (ii) consume larger particles than communities dominated by large cladocerans. I tested these hypotheses in situ by comparing zooplankton grazing in 19 communities from low-productivity lakes where the zooplankton ranged from >99% copepod biomass to >90% large cladoceran biomass (Holopedium gibberum, Daphnia spp.). The zooplankton grazed 1-14% of total chlorophyll per day and 0-17% of the chlorophyll in algae <35 mu m per day. Grazing rates increased with increasing zooplankton biomass (r(2) = 0.34, P < 0.01), but once the effect of zooplankton biomass was accounted for, similar grazing rates were found in copepod-and in cladoceran-dominated communities. The difference in grazing rates on small algae and on the whole phytoplankton assemblage, on the other hand, varied systematically with zooplankton taxonomic composition. Holopedium-dominate communities were most efficient at grazing algae <35 mu m, Bosmina-dominated communities had similar grazing rates on algae <35 mu m and on the whole phytoplankton assemblage, and copepod-dominated communities had similar or slightly higher grazing rates on the whole phytoplankton assemblage. Qualitative differences in grazing selectivity of different zooplankton taxa are observed in complex natural communities.

Export  Tagged XML BibTex